4.7 Article

Taking energy democracy to the streets: Socio-technical learning, institutional dynamism, and integration in South African community energy projects

Journal

ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE
Volume 72, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101906

Keywords

Mini-grid; Off-grid solar utility; Solar home systems; Renewable energy; Energy democracy; Socio-technical experiments; South Africa

Funding

  1. LIRA 2030 programme
  2. Regional Office for Africa, Network of African Science Academics (NASAC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper examines the concept of energy democracy in energy governance, analyzing two socio-technical experiments in South Africa to explore possible energy transition pathways and challenges. The experiments, conducted by a state-owned energy utility and a social enterprise, are community-based renewable energy projects that struggle with issues such as battery management systems and bureaucratic obstacles. The findings contribute to the broader debate on energy democracy in sub-Saharan Africa.
Energy governance is at a critical juncture: facing unavoidable change and also potentially restructuring the energy regime towards greater social justice, equity, and innovation. Energy democracy is a novel form of energy governance and an emergent social movement; as a concept, it may prove to be instrumental for assessing sociotechnical energy transition pathways towards the goals of democracy and decentralisation. This paper considers four possible energy transition pathways towards energy democracy by analysing two 'socio-technical experiments' in South Africa. These 'experiments' are both community-based renewable energy projects: a mini-grid pilot project by the state-owned energy utility (Lynedoch EcoVillage), and an off-grid solar utility using solar home systems by a social enterprise (the iShack project). Certain challenges were unique to each case - Lynedoch's primarily related to system design, while iShack's were the result of dynamic real-world conditions - yet both struggled with battery management systems, institutional disconnect, bureaucratic obstacles, and growing pains towards community cohesion. We argue for an expanded understanding of the four pathways to possible energy futures, taking into consideration the lessons and opportunities arising from these experiments, particularly regarding the advancement of technological innovation and the corresponding impacts at the neighbourhood level. Although the two socio-technical experiments discussed in this paper are micro-level interventions in South Africa, they contribute to the broader debate on sub-Saharan African energy democracy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available