4.1 Article

Lecanactis (Roccellaceae) in Tasmania, with the description of a new saxicolous species and a revised key for the genus in Australia

Journal

LICHENOLOGIST
Volume 53, Issue 1, Pages 95-101

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0024282920000456

Keywords

biodiversity; lichenized Ascomycetes; lichens; taxonomy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study presents six species of the lichen genus Lecanactis found in Tasmania, with one new species described as an endemic to Tasmania. Short descriptions and discussions are provided for all species. A key for all 11 Australian species of the genus is included in the study, along with first time records of certain species in Australia and New South Wales.
The lichen genus Lecanactis Korb. in Tasmania comprises six species: L. abietina (Ach.) Korb., which is widespread and pan-temperate; L. latispora Egea & Torrente and L. neozelandica Egea & Torrente, both shared with New Zealand and with the former recorded here from the Auckland Islands for the first time; L. mollis (Stirt.) Frisch & Ertz, shared with Victoria and New Zealand; L. aff. dilleniana (Ach.) Korb., a European species recorded provisionally for Tasmania on the basis of several sterile collections; L. scopulicola Kantvilas, which is described here as new to science and apparently a Tasmanian endemic. This new taxon occurs in rocky underhangs and is characterized by a thick, leprose thallus containing schizopeltic acid, and 3-septate ascospores, 19-30 x 4.5-6 mu m. Short descriptions and a discussion of distribution and ecology are given for all species. A key for all 11 Australian species of the genus is provided, including L. subfarinosa (C. Knight) Hellb. and L. tibelliana Egea & Torrente, which are recorded for Australia for the first time, and L. platygraphoides (Mull.Arg.) Zahlbr., a first record for New South Wales. Lecanactis spermatospora Egea & Torrente and L. sulphurea Egea & Torrente are also included.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available