4.7 Article

Symbolic transfer entropy test for causality in longitudinal data

Journal

ECONOMIC MODELLING
Volume 94, Issue -, Pages 649-661

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2020.02.007

Keywords

Transfer entropy test; Longitudinal dynamic data; Causality test

Categories

Funding

  1. MINECO projects [ECO2016-76178-P, ECO2015-65637-P]
  2. FEDER funds
  3. Fundacion Seneca, Science and Technology Agency of the Region of Murcia Project [19884/GERM/15]
  4. [PID2019-107192 GB-I00]
  5. [AEI/10.13039/501100011033]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study introduces a non-parametric Granger causality test procedure for longitudinal data using multiple-unit symbolic dynamics and transfer entropy. Monte Carlo simulations demonstrate that the test maintains correct size and high power in situations where linear panel data causality tests do not work. The usefulness of the proposed procedure is illustrated through dynamic causal relationship analysis in various economic contexts.
In this study, we use multiple-unit symbolic dynamics and transfer entropy to develop a non-parametric Granger causality test procedure for longitudinal data. Monte Carlo simulations show that our test exhibits the correct size and a high power in situations where linear panel data causality tests fail, such as (1) when the linearity assumption does not hold, (2) when the data generating process is heterogeneous across the cross-section units or presents structural breaks, (3) when there are extreme observations in some of the cross-section units, (4) when the process exhibits causal dependence on the conditional variance, or (5) when the analysis involves qualitative data. We illustrate the usefulness of our proposed procedure by analyzing the dynamic causal relationships between public expenditure and GDP, between firm productivity and firm size in US manufacturing sectors, and among sovereign credit ratings, growth, and interest rates.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available