4.7 Article

A study on factors affecting service quality and loyalty intention in mobile banking

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102424

Keywords

Mobile banking; Service quality; Loyalty intention; Structural equation modelling

Categories

Funding

  1. Joint NTU-WeBank Research Centre on Fintech, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore [NWJ-2019-006]
  2. RIE 2020 Advanced Manufacturing and Engineering (AME) Programmatic Fund, Singapore [A20G8b0102]
  3. Nanyang Technological University, Nanyang Assistant Professorship (NAP)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study explores the dimensions affecting mobile banking loyalty intention and their effects on service quality and loyalty. Results of structural equation modelling highlight the importance of interface design, system quality, security assurance, and service quality in mobile banking loyalty intention. The implications of the findings on theoretical and managerial aspects are discussed, as well as the limitations of the study.
Mobile banking (MB) is one of the most recent innovations for financial sectors which could have practical value to both users and banks. This study aims to explore the dimensions affecting mobile banking loyalty intention and examine their interrelationships and effects on service quality and loyalty. By referring to service quality model, customised factors affecting mobile banking service quality and loyalty intention were proposed. Survey data were collected from 224 mobile banking users and were analysed based on structural equation modelling (SEM). The results of SEM analysis directly or indirectly highlight the importance of the interface design, system quality, security assurance and service quality in mobile banking loyalty intention. Meanwhile, the implications of the findings on both theoretical and managerial are discussed, as well as the limitation of this study.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available