4.8 Review

Recent developments of nanocatalyzed liquid-phase hydrogen generation

Journal

CHEMICAL SOCIETY REVIEWS
Volume 50, Issue 5, Pages 3437-3484

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0cs00515k

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. China Scholarship Council (CSC) of the People's Republic of China
  2. University of Bordeaux
  3. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review article provides an overview of recent achievements in nanocatalysis for hydrogen production from liquid-phase hydrogen storage materials. The catalysts range from high-performance nanocatalysts to emerging single-atom catalysts. Key aspects discussed include insights into dehydrogenation mechanisms, regenerations from spent liquid chemical hydrides, and tandem reactions using in situ generated hydrogen.
Hydrogen is the most effective and sustainable carrier of clean energy, and liquid-phase hydrogen storage materials with high hydrogen content, reversibility and good dehydrogenation kinetics are promising in view of hydrogen economy. Efficient, low-cost, safe and selective hydrogen generation from chemical storage materials remains challenging, however. In this Review article, an overview of the recent achievements is provided, addressing the topic of nanocatalysis of hydrogen production from liquid-phase hydrogen storage materials including metal-boron hydrides, borane-nitrogen compounds, and liquid organic hydrides. The state-of-the-art catalysts range from high-performance nanocatalysts based on noble and non-noble metal nanoparticles (NPs) to emerging single-atom catalysts. Key aspects that are discussed include insights into the dehydrogenation mechanisms, regenerations from the spent liquid chemical hydrides, and tandem reactions using the in situ generated hydrogen. Finally, challenges, perspectives, and research directions for this area are envisaged.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available