4.7 Article

The ineffectiveness of efficiency: The paradoxical effects of state policy on energy consumption in the United States

Journal

ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE
Volume 71, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101806

Keywords

Energy efficiency; Energy consumption; Jevons paradox; Rebound effect; Energy policy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examines the relationship between energy efficiency policies and state-level energy consumption in the United States, finding that state governments' energy efficiency policies may be positively related to energy consumption instead of reducing it. This suggests that savings from efficiency improvement are often channeled to expanding production and consumption, with significant implications for energy use.
This study examines the relationship between energy efficiency policies and state-level energy consumption in the United States. In doing this, we assess tenets of ecological modernization theory, which suggests developed societies can and will leverage technology, including efficiency innovations and policies, to limit human demands and impacts on nature without needing to curb economic growth. We use panel data spanning 2009 through 2016 for all 50 U.S. states. The results from fixed effects regression analysis contradict the ecological modernization proposition regarding the utility of energy efficiency improvement. We show, overall, that state governments' energy efficiency policies are either positively related to energy consumption or their effects fail to reach statistical significance. Our findings suggest that savings from efficiency improvement are often channeled to expanding production and consumption, which has significant implications for energy use. Thus, while efficiency improvement, in principle, can reduce energy demand and contribute to sustainability, the challenge is how to deploy it without unintentionally incentivizing more consumption.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available