4.3 Article

Towards a taxonomy of crowdsourced delivery business models

Publisher

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/IJPDLM-10-2019-0326

Keywords

Crowd logistics; Crowdshipping; Crowdsourced delivery; Sharing economy; Cluster analysis; Business model

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper analyzes the business models of 105 companies offering crowdsourced delivery services, developing a detailed framework with 74 features and identifying six distinct clusters of crowdshipping business models. It finds which type of crowdshipping business models is the most successful based on social media metrics.
Purpose The paper aims to develop (1) a comprehensive framework for classifying crowdshipping business models and (2) a taxonomy of currently implemented crowdshipping business models. Design/methodology/approach The business models of 105 companies offering crowdsourced delivery services are analysed. Cluster analysis and principal component analysis are applied to develop a business model taxonomy. Findings A detailed crowdsourced delivery business model framework with 74 features is developed. Based on it, six distinct clusters of crowdshipping business models are identified. One cluster stands out as the most appealing to customers based on social media metrics, indicating which type of crowdshipping business models is the most successful. Research limitations/implications Detailed investigations of each of the six clusters and of recent crowdshipping business model developments are needed in further research in order to enhance the derived taxonomy. Practical implications This paper serves as a best-practices guide for both start-ups and global logistics operators for establishing or further developing their crowdsourced delivery business models. Originality/value This paper provides a holistic understanding of the business models applied in the crowdshipping industry and is a valuable contribution to the yet small amount of studies in the crowd logistics field.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available