4.8 Article

Modulating the stacking modes of nanosized metal-organic frameworks by morphology engineering for isomer separation

Journal

CHEMICAL SCIENCE
Volume 12, Issue 11, Pages 4104-4110

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0sc06747d

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21922407]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province of China [BK20190086]
  3. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions
  4. Robert A. Welch Foundation
  5. Welch Endowed Chair [A-0030]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Modulating the stacking modes of nanoscale NU-901 through morphology engineering resulted in different morphologies such as nanosheets, interpenetrated nanosheets, and nanoparticles. The three stacked nanoscale NU-901 demonstrated varied separation abilities, all showing superior performance compared to bulk phase NU-901. This work provides a new approach for modulating the stacking modes of nano-sized MOFs and enhancing their separation capabilities.
Modulating different stacking modes of nanoscale metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) introduces different properties and functionalities but remains a great challenge. Here, we describe a morphology engineering method to modulate the stacking modes of nanoscale NU-901. The nanoscale NU-901 is stacked through solvent removal after one-pot solvothermal synthesis, in which different morphologies from nanosheets (NS) to interpenetrated nanosheets (I-NS) and nanoparticles (NP) were obtained successfully. The stacked NU-901-NS, NU-901-I-NS, and NU-901-NP exhibited relatively aligned stacking, random stacking, and close packing, respectively. The three stacked nanoscale NU-901 exhibited different separation abilities and all showed better performance than bulk phase NU-901. Our work provides a new morphology engineering route for the modulation of the stacking modes of nano-sized MOFs and improves the separation abilities of MOFs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available