4.4 Article

Consistency checks to improve measurement with the Personal and Social Performance Scale (PSP)

Journal

SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH
Volume 228, Issue -, Pages 529-533

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2020.11.040

Keywords

PSP; Personal and Social Performance Scale; Reliability; Measurement; PANSS

Categories

Funding

  1. Innovative Medicine Initiative Joint Undertaking of European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations (EFPIA) [115008]
  2. European Union
  3. Elie Wiesel Chair at Bar-Ilan University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The International Society for CNS Clinical Trials and Methodology assembled a working group to identify consistency/inconsistency flags for the Personal and Social Performance Scale (PSP). These flags were applied to assessments from a randomized clinical trial data of antipsychotics in schizophrenia, and nearly 20% of the PSP ratings had at least one inconsistency flag raised. The application of flags to clinical ratings may improve the reliability of ratings and validity of trials.
International Society for CNS Clinical Trials and Methodology convened an expert Working Group that assembled consistency/inconsistency flags for the Personal and Social Performance Scale (PSP). One hundred and forty seven flags were identified, 16 flag errors in deriving the PSP decile (i.e., total) score from the four individual domain scores, 74 flag inconsistencies between domain scores relative to Positive and Negative Symptom Scale (PANSS) item ratings and 57 flag inconsistencies between PSP decile score and PANSS items ratings. The flags were applied to assessments from randomized clinical trial data of antipsychotics in schizophrenia from almost 18,000 ratings. Twenty-two flags were raised in at least 5 of 1000 ratings. Nearly 20% of the PSP ratings had at least one inconsistency flag raised. Application of flags to clinical ratings may improve the reliability of ratings and validity of trials. (C) 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available