4.4 Review

Addressing the mental health impact of COVID-19 through population health

Journal

CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW
Volume 85, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2021.102006

Keywords

COVID-19; Mental health; Risk factor; Intervention; Evidence-based psychotherapy; Population mental health

Funding

  1. National Institute on Drug Abuse [R21DA04219801, R01DA046651]
  2. VA Health Services Research and Development [I0X002521]
  3. Department of Defense [W81XWH-17-C0236]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The COVID-19 pandemic has led to negative mental health outcomes globally, requiring a comprehensive approach that integrates clinical psychology, psychiatry, and other fields. Systematically assessing pandemic risk factors, mental health outcomes, and intervention strategies can help identify and address issues. Using non-traditional models and ongoing evaluation is crucial for expanding the reach of mental health interventions.
The COVID-19 pandemic has and will continue to result in negative mental health outcomes such as depression, anxiety and traumatic stress in people and populations throughout the world. A population mental health perspective informed by clinical psychology, psychiatry and dissemination and implementation science is ideally suited to address the broad, multi-faceted and long-lasting mental health impact of the pandemic. Informed by a systematic review of the burgeoning empirical research on the COVID-19 pandemic and research on prior coronavirus pandemics, we link pandemic risk factors, negative mental health outcomes and appropriate intervention strategies. We describe how social risk factors and pandemic stressors will contribute to negative mental health outcomes, especially among vulnerable populations. We evaluate the scalability of primary, secondary and tertiary interventions according to mental health target, population, modality, intensity and provider type to provide a unified strategy for meeting population mental health needs. Traditional models, in which evidence-based therapies delivered are delivered in-person, by a trained expert, at a specialty care location have proved difficult to scale. The use of non-traditional models, tailoring preventive interventions to populations based on their needs, and ongoing coordinated evaluation of intervention implementation and effectiveness will be critical to refining our efforts to increase reach.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available