4.1 Review

Evaluation of the Effects of Nanomaterials on Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Responses: Underlining the Benefits of Nanotechnology for Agricultural Applications

Journal

ACS AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 1, Issue 2, Pages 44-54

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsagscitech.1c00030

Keywords

rice; engineered nanomaterials; crop quality; plant nutrition; nanofertilizer

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Agriculture [2016-67021-24985]
  2. National Science Foundation (NSF) [CHE-0840525]
  3. NSF ERC [ERC-1449500]
  4. NSF
  5. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) [DBI-1266377]
  6. STARs Retention Award of the University of Texas System

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The application of nanotechnology in agriculture, particularly in rice production, is highlighted as potentially impacting agricultural ecosystems. This review discusses the responses of different rice cultivars exposed to ENPs at various growth stages, emphasizing critical knowledge gaps concerning the potential use of nanotechnology to enhance agricultural production.
The application of nanotechnology in the field of agriculture as nanofertilizers or nanopesticides is receiving increased attention from regulatory agencies and research institutions worldwide. Soil and bodies of water are among the most massive sinks for commercial products containing engineered nanoparticles (ENPs) after use. This may affect agricultural ecosystems, mainly those with a high demand for irrigation water supply such as rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivars. This review describes the responses of different rice cultivars exposed to ENPs at different growth stages and under different conditions. Data on seed germination, uptake and translocation of ENPs, biomass production, nutrient profiles, and photosynthesis-related parameters are discussed. Critical knowledge gaps concerning the potential use of nanotechnology to improve agricultural production are highlighted.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available