Journal
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW
Volume 115, Issue 2, Pages 486-505Publisher
CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0003055420001136
Keywords
-
Categories
Funding
- Swiss National Science Foundation [100017_146170/1, PP00P1-139035]
- Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [PP00P1_139035, 100017_146170] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The effects of austerity measures in response to financial crises causing electoral backlash are widely debated, but in reality, most voters tend to support austerity as the preferred response. The preference for austerity is highly influenced by political backers and the specific composition of spending cuts and tax hikes.
The effects of austerity in response to financial crises are widely contested and assumed to cause significant electoral backlash. Nonetheless, governments routinely adopt austerity when confronting economic downturns and swelling deficits. We explore this puzzle by distinguishing public acceptance of austerity as a general approach and support for specific austerity packages. Using original survey data from five European countries, we show that austerity is in fact the preferred response among most voters. We develop potential explanations for this surprising preference and demonstrate the empirical limitations of accounts centered on economic interests or an intuitive framing advantage. Instead, we show that the preference for austerity is highly sensitive to its political backers and precise composition of spending cuts and tax hikes. Using a novel approach to estimate support for historical austerity programs, we contend that governments' strategic crafting of policy packages is a key factor underlying the support for austerity.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available