4.6 Article

Agricultural Land Use Change in Chongqing and the Policy Rationale behind It: A Multiscale Perspective

Journal

LAND
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/land10030275

Keywords

agricultural land use transition; construction land; multiscale; land policy; Chongqing

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2019YFD1100801]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Agricultural land resources are crucial for food and agricultural sustainability in China, but strict land use control does not prevent erosion by urban sprawl. Research on agricultural land conversion in Chongqing shows that the conversion is mainly concentrated in the main city area and its surroundings, with a more even spatial distribution at the county/district scale compared to the town/village scale. The study highlights the need for tangible approaches for a sustainable rural-urban transformation.
Agricultural land resources have been the central issue for the Chinese government in its attempts to secure food and agricultural sustainability. Yet strict land use control does not protect the agricultural land from erosion by urban expansion. Identifying the specific patterns and mechanisms of the agricultural land conversion, thus, is critical for land management and related decision making. Based on the annual nominal 30 m land use/land cover datasets (called CLUD-A), this study goes below the national/regional level to examine agricultural land conversion in Chongqing from a multiscale perspective. At the metropolis and its subdivision's scales, the volume of the conversion area has been generally increasing, from 122.40 km(2) in 1980-1990, 162.26 km(2) in 1990-2000, and 706.14 km(2) in 2000-2010, to 684.83 km(2) in 2010-2015. Such a conversion in the main city area and its surroundings far outweighed that in the rural outskirts, as 68.9% (1990-2000), 92.2% (2000-2010), and 82.7% (2010-2015) of the conversion happened in the former. Moreover, values of Gini coefficients and coefficient of variation (CV) based on the county/district scale (Gini [0.46, 0.64], CV [0.69, 0.99] throughout the four periods) are much lower than those based on the town/village scale (Gini [0.88, 0.94], CV [3.18, 4.47] throughout the four periods), suggesting the uneven extent of spatial distribution of the agricultural land conversion trickles down along with the downscale of administration: the lower the administrative level, the more severe the unbalance. The policy rationale behind this transition is also discussed. This research argues for tangible approaches to a sustainable rural-urban transformation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available