4.7 Article

Citizen participation at the micro-community level: The case of the green alley projects in Quebec City

Journal

CITIES
Volume 112, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2020.103065

Keywords

Citizen initiative; Participative planning; Community empowerment; Small-scale gardening; Greening initiatives; Civic engagement

Categories

Funding

  1. MITACS Accelerate [IT10521]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Citizens play a role in transitioning from institutional channels to less formal modes of participation, supporting greening projects can re-mobilize residents to participate in urban planning, and NGOs and other groups acting as intermediaries facilitate civic action.
In public or political affairs, civic engagement in transitioning from institutional channels to less formal modes of participation, which have an immediate impact on the local space. For example, greening projects have emerged to address issues such as climate change or to challenge institutional urban planning and practices. These smallscale gardening and greening initiatives can be seen as a way to re-mobilize inhabitants and even involve them in urban planning. But is this the case? How do citizens frame their role and relationship with the public space, and in terms of the local administration? Also, NGOs and other groups acting as ?mediators? in the process facilitate civic action, but how do citizens feel about the actions of these facilitators? Based on an action-research project carried out in Quebec City (Quebec, Canada), we address what it means to take part in greening projects at a micro-scale. Using participant observations, 20 interviews, and field notes, we look at how such projects operate and evolve. The greening projects that were studied benefited from the support of the NGO, which acted as a facilitator throughout the process. This contextualized facilitation allowed the initiative to gain momentum socially, politically, and spatially.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available