4.5 Article

When normative framing saves Mr. Nature: Role of consumer efficacy in proenvironmental adoption

Journal

PSYCHOLOGY & MARKETING
Volume 38, Issue 8, Pages 1340-1362

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mar.21486

Keywords

anthropomorphism; efficacy; normative framing; proenvironmental behavior; self‐ construal

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study demonstrates that incorporating normative gain into message framing is more effective in promoting proenvironmental actions, especially under positively framed information. The psychological mechanism from collective efficacy to self-efficacy explains this superiority. The effect of normative gain is amplified by anthropomorphism, and is stronger among individuals low in interdependent self-construal.
This study examines the proenvironmental persuasion of the so-called normative framing that incorporates normative influence (i.e., social norms) into message framing (i.e., loss vs. gain). Across three green contexts (i.e., towel reuse, paperless adoption, and ugly food consumption), this study shows that normative gain is consistently more effective than both normative loss and pure normative influence in promoting proenvironmental act, which is particularly motivated by positively framed information under the prospect-theoretic reasoning. This superior effect of normative gain is explained by the psychological sequence from collective efficacy to self-efficacy as the serial underlying mechanism. This study further unveils the boundary condition of anthropomorphism in amplifying this superiority (i.e., Mr. Nature, happy earth face) and reveals that the advantageous effect of normative gain is stronger among those low in interdependent self-construal. Our findings might provide helpful and relevant guidelines for businesses to operate sustainably by shifting their customers' behaviors to be greener.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available