4.4 Article

COVID-19 and the political geography of racialisation: Ethnographic cases in San Francisco, Los Angeles and Detroit

Journal

GLOBAL PUBLIC HEALTH
Volume 16, Issue 8-9, Pages 1396-1410

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17441692.2021.1908395

Keywords

Racialisation; political geography; inequality; COVID-19; United States; medical anthropology

Funding

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [189186]
  2. Mediterranean Institute for Advanced Study [Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Forderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung]
  3. Institut Paoli Calmette [Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Forderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated global inequality, especially in the United States where non-white communities have suffered greater economic and social losses. The political geography of racialization has intensified the crisis, undermining public health responses.
The COVID-19 pandemic has overwhelmed health systems around the globe, and intensified the lethality of social and political inequality. In the United States, where public health departments have been severely defunded, Black, Native, Latinx communities and those experiencing poverty in the country's largest cities are disproportionately infected and disproportionately dying. Based on our collective ethnographic work in three global cities in the U.S. cities (San Francisco, Los Angeles, and Detroit), we identify how the political geography of racialisation potentiated the COVID-19 crisis, exacerbating the social and economic toll of the pandemic for non-white communities, and undercut the public health response. Our analysis is specific to the current COVID19 crisis in the U.S, however the lessons from these cases are important for understanding and responding to the corrosive political processes that have entrenched inequality in pandemics around the world.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available