4.5 Article

Comparative environmental impact evaluation using life cycle assessment approach: a case study of integrated membrane-filtration system for the treatment of aerobically-digested palm oil mill effluent

Journal

SUSTAINABLE ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH
Volume 31, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s42834-021-00089-5

Keywords

Life cycle assessment; Environmental impact; Integrated membrane filtration system; Palm oil mill effluent

Funding

  1. Dana Modal Insan [MI-2019-017]
  2. Geran Universiti Penyelidikan [GUP-2017-098]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This university-industry project aimed to mitigate wastewater pollution from the palm oil industry by integrating treatment processes, with electricity consumption identified as the main environmental impact factor. The life cycle assessment revealed that Combination IV, with the least electricity consumption, is the most environmentally-friendly process.
Aiming to mitigate wastewater pollution arising from the palm oil industry, this university-industry research-and-development project focused on the integration of serial treatment processes, including the use of moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR), pre-treatment with sand filters and activated carbon filters, and membrane technology for aerobically-digested palm oil mill effluent (POME) treatment. To assess the potential of this sustainable alternative practice in the industry, the developed technology was demonstrated in a pilot-scale facility: four combinations (Combinations I to IV) of unit operations were developed in an integrated membrane-filtration system. Combination I includes a MBBR, pre-treatment unit comprising sand filters and activated carbon filters, ultrafiltration (UF) membrane, and reverse osmosis (RO) membrane, while Combination II excludes MBBR, Combination III excludes UF membrane, and Combination IV excludes both MBBR and UF membrane. Life cycle assessment (LCA) was performed to evaluate potential environmental impacts arising from each combination while achieving the goal of obtaining recycled and reusable water from the aerobically-digested POME treatment. It is reported that electricity consumption is the predominant factor contributing to most of those categories (50-77%) as the emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen oxides, and volatile mercury during the combustion of fossil fuels. Combination I in the integrated membrane-filtration system with all unit operations incurring high electricity consumption (52MJ) contributed to the greatest environmental impact. Electricity consumption registers the highest impact towards all life cycle impact categories: 73% on climate change, 80% on terrestrial acidification, 51% on eutrophication, and 43% on human toxicity. Conversely, Combination IV is the most environmentally-friendly process, since it involves only two-unit operations - pre-treatment unit (comprising sand filters and activated carbon filters) and RO membrane unit - and thus incurs the least electricity consumption (41.6MJ). The LCA offers insights into each combination of the operating process and facilitates both researchers and the industry towards sustainable production.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available