4.2 Article

The Europeanness of the 2019 EP elections and the mobilizing power of European issues

Journal

POLITICS
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages 451-466

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0263395721992930

Keywords

elections; European Parliament; political attitudes; political participation

Funding

  1. German Research Foundation (DFG)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article explores the 'Europeanness' of European elections and its impact on voter participation in the 2019 EP elections. Findings suggest that these elections were more European than ever before, but the level of Europeanness varied among countries. The orientation towards EU politics of voters influences electoral participation, although national factors still play a significant role.
Less researched than the second-order character of elections to the European Parliament (EP) is the 'Europeanness' of European elections and its implications for voter participation in these elections. This article aims to fill this gap by studying the Europeanness of the public debate in the run-up to the 2019 EP elections and the mobilizing power of European issues in these electoral contests. In doing this, we draw on a new data set covering intriguing aspects of the 2019 EP elections. The findings of the empirical analysis of media and survey data indicate that the elections to the EP were more European contests than ever before in the history of these elections - yet this is not true in the same way for all of the countries under consideration. Moreover, the Europeanness of electorates, measured as genuine orientations towards EU politics, matters for electoral participation and thus has the power to mobilize citizens. Nonetheless, national factors still play an important role in these elections. These findings are insightful for the future assessment of EP elections and the scholarly debate over multi-level electoral politics in Europe.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available