4.7 Article

405+/-5 nm light emitting diode illumination causes photodynamic inactivation of Salmonella spp. on fresh-cut papaya without deterioration

Journal

FOOD MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 62, Issue -, Pages 124-132

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fm.2016.10.002

Keywords

405 nm-light emitting diode; Photodynamic inactivation; Oxidative damage; Papaya; Salmonella

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education's Academic Research Fund (AcRF) Tier 1 [R-143-000-624-112]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the antibacterial effect of 405 +/- 5 nm light emitting diode (LED) illumination against four Salmonella serovars on fresh-cut papaya and on fruit quality at various storage temperatures. To determine the antibacterial mechanism of LED illumination at 0:9 kJ/cm(2), oxidative damage to DNA and membrane lipids of Salmonella in phosphate-buffered saline solution was measured. The populations of Salmonella on cut fruits were significantly (P < 0.05) reduced by 0.3-13 log CFU/cm(2) at chilling temperatures following LED illumination for 36-48 h (1.3-1.7 kJ/cm(2)). However, at room temperature, bacterial populations increased rapidly to 6.3-7.0 log CFU/cm(2) following LED illumination for 24 h (0.9 kJ/cm(2)), which was approximately 1.0 log lower than the number of colonies on non-illuminated fruits. Levels of bacterial DNA oxidation significantly increased, whereas lipid peroxidation in bacterial membrane was not observed, suggesting that DNA oxidation contributes to photodynamic inactivation by LED illumination. LED illumination did not adversely affect the physicochemical and nutritional qualities of cut papaya, regardless of storage temperature. These results indicate that a food chiller equipped with 405 +/- 5 nm LEDs can preserve fresh-cut papayas in retail stores without deterioration, minimizing the risk of salmonellosis. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available