4.8 Article

A rapid and sensitive fluorescence biosensor based on plasmonic PCR

Journal

NANOSCALE
Volume 13, Issue 15, Pages 7348-7354

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1nr00102g

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. City University of Hong Kong [9667180, 7200583]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Plasmonic PCR using metallic nanoparticles is cost-effective compared to traditional thermocycling, but its strong fluorescence quenching often requires additional post-processing steps. A rapid and sensitive plasmonic photothermal PCR (PPT-PCR) assay has been developed, combining magnetic bimetallic nanoparticles and fluorescence detection to detect DNA targets within 5.5 minutes, significantly reducing overall assay time.
Plasmonic PCR utilizing metallic nanoparticles has shown great advantages compared to the commercial thermocycler equipment in terms of cost, size and processing time. However, due to the strong fluorescence quenching, plasmonic nanoparticle-based PCR requires additional post-processing steps such as centrifugation and gel electrophoresis. This process increases the overall diagnostic time, offsetting the benefits of fast thermocycling. Here, we report a rapid and sensitive plasmonic photothermal PCR (PPT-PCR) assay method based on in situ end-point fluorescence detection. By using plasmonic magnetic bi-functional nanoparticles, PPT-PCR involving 30 thermocycles and fluorescence detection following magnetic separation has successfully shown that DNA targets can be detected within 5.5 minutes. The limit of detection (3.3 copies per mu L) is comparable with that of the conventional real-time quantitative PCR; however, the assay time is about 5.5 times shorter for the PPT-PCR. The strategy of combining the photothermal effect and magnetic separation into a single particle will open new horizons in the development of fast and sensitive PCR-based biosensors for point-of care testing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available