4.7 Article

Improving the Precision of Ability Estimates Using Time-On-Task Variables: Insights From the PISA 2012 Computer-Based Assessment of Mathematics

Journal

FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY
Volume 12, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.579128

Keywords

log files; computer-based assessment; time on task; measurement precision; measurement invariance; PISA

Funding

  1. research group Frontier Research in Educational Measurement at University of Oslo (FREMO)
  2. Gustafsson & Skrondal Visiting Scholarship at the Centre for Educational Measurement, University of Oslo

Ask authors/readers for more resources

By analyzing the time spent by students on mathematics tests, this study found that incorporating response times and task time measurements can improve the accuracy of ability estimates. It also revealed differences between countries in how students approach test items and their response processes. Additionally, the study showed that including response times can capture additional information through differences in modeling structure, although this may not align with the testing objective.
Log-file data from computer-based assessments can provide useful collateral information for estimating student abilities. In turn, this can improve traditional approaches that only consider response accuracy. Based on the amounts of time students spent on 10 mathematics items from the PISA 2012, this study evaluated the overall changes in and measurement precision of ability estimates and explored country-level heterogeneity when combining item responses and time-on-task measurements using a joint framework. Our findings suggest a notable increase in precision with the incorporation of response times and indicate differences between countries in how respondents approached items as well as in their response processes. Results also showed that additional information could be captured through differences in the modeling structure when response times were included. However, such information may not reflect the testing objective.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available