4.3 Article

A water quality index for the removal requirement and purification treatment effort of micropollutants

Journal

WATER SUPPLY
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages 128-145

Publisher

IWA PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.2166/ws.2020.289

Keywords

micropollutants; purification treatment; Water Framework Directive; water quality index

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A novel framework of indices was used to evaluate the water quality and purification treatment level of the Rhine River, revealing differences between sampling sites in index values. Despite the introduction of the WFD in 2000, the required purification treatment level for the Rhine River has not improved over the years.
The European Water Framework Directive (WFD) states that measures should be taken to improve the quality of water bodies to prevent further required extension of current (drinking) water treatment. Hence, for water managers it is of key importance to evaluate and report on the quality of water and the level of purification treatment that is required. For this purpose a novel framework of indices is defined, and their definition allows the inclusion of new, emerging substances. The indices can be calculated based on micropollutant characteristics alone and do not require any knowledge of specific purification treatment installations. Applying this framework of indices to water bodies provides an objective and reproducible way of evaluating the required purification treatment level. The indices were calculated for water quality data for up to 600 micropollutants from five sampling locations along the river Rhine in the Netherlands. This revealed differences between the sampling sites (index values ranged from 145 to 273) and showed that for the river Rhine the required purification treatment level, as well as the underlying removal requirement and purification treatment effort, have not improved over the years, despite the introduction of the WFD in 2000.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available