4.7 Article

Volatile fraction analysis by HS-SPME/GC-MS and chemometric modeling for traceability of apples cultivated in the Northeast Italy

Journal

FOOD CONTROL
Volume 78, Issue -, Pages 215-221

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2017.02.036

Keywords

Apples; Volatiles; Ancient cultivars; Organic farming; HS-SPME/GC-MS; Multivariate analysis; Chemometrics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The present study aimed at characterising the flavour composition of apple cultivars grown in the Northeast Italy through different cultivation methods, by combining Head Space-Solid Phase Micro Extraction/Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometry (HS-SPME/GC-MS) analysis of volatile fraction with chemometric tools for class modeling. In order to represent the overall production in the target area, the investigation included 42 apples varieties consisting of ancient, non-native and new hybrid cultivars grown in Friuli Venezia Giulia and Alto Adige-South Tyrol, respectively. Moreover, apple samples from both conventional and organic agricultural practices were considered. Overall 118 volatile compounds were identified in the samples and Partial Least Squares-Discriminant Analysis (PLS-DA) was used to classify apples based on their different geographical origin or growing conditions. Models highlighted good classification results both in calibration (over 91%) and cross-validation (over 87%), enabling to obtain a good separation between apple categories with high prediction accuracy (over 90%). In addition, the Variable Importance in Projection (VIP) scores of the PLS-DA models were calculated, allowing to identify a reduced number of volatiles (e.g., ethanol, ethyl acetate, isobutyl acetate, propyl propanoate, 1-hexanol, D-limonene, (Z)-2-hexen-l-ol acetate and others) which are relevant for the discrimination of different apple groups. The proposed approach may represent a powerful tool for fruit traceability. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available