4.7 Article

Overcoming Pd-TiO2 Deactivation during H2 Production from Photoreforming Using Cu@Pd Nanoparticles Supported on TiO2

Journal

ACS APPLIED NANO MATERIALS
Volume 4, Issue 3, Pages 3204-3219

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsanm.1c00345

Keywords

copper; palladium; core-shell; TiO2; H-2 photoreforming; DFT

Funding

  1. M-ERA.Net programme through Acciones Programacion Conjunta (Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion) [PCIN-2017-056]
  2. Science Foundation Ireland through the Horizon 2020 M-ERA.Net cofund program, project RATOCAT [685451, SFI 17/M-ERA/3418]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Different Cu@Pd-TiO2 systems were prepared using a two-step synthesis method to create a bimetallic co-catalyst for the H-2 photoreforming reaction, resulting in the formation of a core@shell structure. The Cu@Pd-1.0-TiO2 bimetallic system showed higher photocatalytic H-2 production compared to Pd-supported TiO2.
Different Cu@Pd-TiO2 systems have been prepared by a two-step synthesis to obtain a bimetallic co-catalyst for the H-2 photoreforming reaction. We find that the tailored deposition of Pd covering the Cu nanoclusters by a galvanic replacement process results in the formation of a core@shell structure. The photocatalytic H-2 production after 18 h is 350 mmol/g on the Cu@Pd-1.0-TiO2 bimetallic system, which is higher than that on the monometallic ones with a H-2 production of 250 mmol/g on Pd-supported TiO2. Surface characterization by highangle annular dark-field scanning transmission electron microscopy, H-2-temperatureprogramed reduction, CO-FTIR spectroscopy, and XPS gives clear evidence of the formation of a core@shell structure. With a Pd loading of 0.2-0.3 at. %, we propose a full coverage of the Cu nanoparticles with Pd. Long-time photoreforming runs show the enhanced performance of supported Cu@Pd with respect to bare palladium leading to a more stable catalyst and ultimately higher H-2 production.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available