4.7 Article

An ultrasensitive gray-imaging-based quantitative immunochromatographic detection method for fumonisin B1 in agricultural products

Journal

FOOD CONTROL
Volume 80, Issue -, Pages 333-340

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2017.05.013

Keywords

Fumonisin B-1; Monoclonal antibody; Gray imaging; Immunoassay; Agricultural product

Funding

  1. Special Fund for Agro-397scienti398 c Research in the Public Interest [201203094-4]
  2. Special Fund for Grain-scienti399 c Research in the Public Interest [201513006-02]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of 400 China [31101299, 31171702, 31401601, 21205118, 401402, 2016YFE0119900, 2016C50002]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fumonisins (FBs) are widely found in rice, maize, peanut, wheat, and other agricultural products. These have been detected using a chromatography technique, whereas the rapid assay by a highly sensitive monoclonal antibody is minimally reported. Herein, a highly sensitive monoclonal antibody (7A11) was successfully developed by hybridoma technique. The 50% inhibition concentration (IC50) of 7A11 monoclonal antibody was 0.32 ng/mL in an optimized buffer. The cross-reactivity between fumonisin B-1 and fumonisin B-2, B-3 was 4.3% and 12.8%, respectively. Based on the newly developed 7A11 antibody, a high sensitivity indirect competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (icELISA) and gold nanoparticles-based gray imaging quantification immunoassay (GNPs-GI) were established. The analytical range of icELISA was 0.08-1.38 ng/mL and that for GNPs-GI was 0.24-15 ng/ml. Both the methods showed adequate recoveries (80.0-105.8% for icELISA and 78.5-115.2% for GNPs-GI) in spiked samples. Compared to high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), icELISA and GNPs-GI indicated reliability that could be used for further detection of fumonisin B-1 in agricultural products. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available