Journal
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR EQUITY IN HEALTH
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages -Publisher
BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12939-021-01428-z
Keywords
Men's health; Sub-Sahara Africa; Health literacy; Health seeking
Categories
Funding
- Joint Health Systems Research Initiative (MRC/ESRC/DfID/Wellcome Trust) [MR/S013253/1]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Gender and sex play a crucial role in health literacy, health seeking behavior, and health outcomes. However, research primarily focusing on women's health has left a gap in understanding men's health issues in global health research. A review of empirical studies targeting men's health in Sub-Saharan Africa identified different conceptualizations of men and their health, including gender-responsive interventions categorized as gender-neutral, -partnering, -sensitive and -transformative, with a lack of data on transformative interventions. Addressing this gap is crucial for improving men's access and engagement with health services in the region.
Background: Sex and gender have been shown to influence health literacy, health seeking behaviour, and health outcomes. However, research examining the links between gender and health has mainly focused on women's health, which is a long-standing global health priority. We examine literature focused on the 'missing men' in global health research, in particular empirical studies that document interventions, programmes, and services targeting men's health issues in Sub-Saharan Africa. Within these studies, we identify dominant conceptualisations of men and men's health and how these have influenced the design of men's health interventions and services. Methods: This is a scoping review of published and grey literature. Following comprehensive searches, we included 56 studies in the review. We conducted a bibliographic analysis of all studies and used inductive methods to analyse textual excerpts referring to conceptualizations of men and service design. An existing framework to categorise services, interventions, or programs according to their gender-responsiveness was adapted and used for the latter analysis. Results: From the included studies, we distinguished four principal ways in which men were conceptualized in programs and interventions: men are variously depicted as 'gatekeepers'; 'masculine' men, 'marginal' men and as 'clients. Additionally, we classified the gender-responsiveness of interventions, services or programmes described in the studies within the following categories: gender-neutral, -partnering, -sensitive and -transformative. Interventions described are predominantly gender-neutral or gender-partnering, with limited data available on transformative interventions. Health systems design features - focused mainly on achieving women's access to, and uptake of services - may contribute to the latter gap leading to poor access and engagement of men with health services. Conclusion: This review highlights the need for transformation in sub-Saharan African health systems towards greater consideration of men's health issues and health-seeking patterns.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available