4.7 Article

Occurrence of aflatoxin M1 in pasteurized and UHT milks in China in 2014-2015

Journal

FOOD CONTROL
Volume 78, Issue -, Pages 94-99

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2017.02.042

Keywords

Occurrence; Aflatoxin Ml; Pasteurized milk; UHT milk; China

Funding

  1. Special Fund for Agro-Scientific Research in the Public Interest [201403071]
  2. Special Fund for risk assessment in milk [GJFP2016008]
  3. Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Program [ASTIP-IAS12]
  4. Modern AgroIndustry Technology Research System of the PR China [CARS-37]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This survey was performed to assess the safety of milk in China, specifically by assessing the presence of aflatoxin Ml (AFMI) residues in pasteurized and ultra high temperature (UHT) milk. In 2014-2015, 193 samples of UHT milk were collected from different cities in China. In 2015, 38 samples of pasteurized milk were collected from different cities in China. AFM1 was detected using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). AFMI positivity was defined as a concentration exceeding the detection limit of the assay (0.005 mu g/kg). Other cut-offs that were used were the legal AFM1 limits in the European Union (EU) and China (0.05 and 0.5 mu g/kg, respectively). In 2014 and 2015, 88.6% and 59.6% of UHT milk samples were AFM1-positive, respectively. The pasteurized milk samples were less frequently AFM1-positive (47.4%). In 11.9% of the 2014-2015 UHT milk samples, the AFM1 levels exceeded the EU limit. This is lower than the frequency we recorded in 2010 (20.3%). None of the pasteurized milk samples exceeded the EU limit in 2015. The UHT milk samples from the north of China were less likely to be contaminated than the samples from the south in both 2014 and 2015. None of the samples exceeded the Chinese legal limit. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available