4.7 Article

Population-Based Geospatial and Molecular Epidemiologic Study of Tuberculosis Transmission Dynamics, Botswana, 2012-2016

Journal

EMERGING INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume 27, Issue 3, Pages 835-844

Publisher

CENTERS DISEASE CONTROL & PREVENTION
DOI: 10.3201/eid2703.203840

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01AI097045]
  2. President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief through the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tuberculosis elimination requires interrupting the transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. The study in Botswana found that factors associated with localized TB transmission events included residing in high TB burden areas, being under 24 years old, current smoking, and unemployment. Patients with known HIV-positive status had lower odds of being involved in localized transmission events.
Tuberculosis (TB) elimination requires interrupting transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. We used a multidisciplinary approach to describe TB transmission in 2 sociodemographically distinct districts in Botswana (Kopanyo Study). During August 2012-March 2016, all patients who had TB were enrolled, their sputum samples were cultured, and M. tuberculosis isolates were genotyped by using 24-locus mycobacterial interspersed repetitive units-variable number of tandem repeats. Of 5,515 TB patients, 4,331 (79%) were enrolled. Annualized TB incidence varied by geography (range 66-1,140 TB patients/100,000 persons). A total of 1,796 patient isolates had valid genotyping results and residential geocoordinates; 780 (41%) patients were involved in a localized TB transmission event. Residence in areas with a high burden of TB, age <24 years, being a current smoker, and unemployment were factors associated with localized transmission events. Patients with known HIV-positive status had lower odds of being involved in localized transmission.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available