4.7 Review

Origins of human disease: the chrono-epigenetic perspective

Journal

NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS
Volume 22, Issue 8, Pages 533-546

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41576-021-00348-6

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Krembil Foundation
  2. Canadian Institutes of Health and Research [TGH-158223, PJT 148719, IGH-155180, NTC-154084, MOP-133496]
  3. Lithuanian Science Foundation [S-MIP-19-66, S-SEN-20-19, 09.3.3-LMT-K-712-17-0008]
  4. Brain Canada

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Epigenetics enriches human disease studies with new interpretations, but identifying causal mechanisms has been challenging. Recent findings in intra-individual and cyclical epigenetic variation present new opportunities, and the temporality in the epigenome may help integrate diverse disease studies.
Epigenetics has enriched human disease studies by adding new interpretations to disease features that cannot be explained by genetic and environmental factors. However, identifying causal mechanisms of epigenetic origin has been challenging. New opportunities have risen from recent findings in intra-individual and cyclical epigenetic variation, which includes circadian epigenetic oscillations. Cytosine modifications display deterministic temporal rhythms, which may drive ageing and complex disease. Temporality in the epigenome, or the 'chrono' dimension, may help the integration of epigenetic, environmental and genetic disease studies, and reconcile several disparities stemming from the arbitrarily delimited research fields. The ultimate goal of chrono-epigenetics is to predict disease risk, age of onset and disease dynamics from within individual-specific temporal dynamics of epigenomes. In this Perspective article, Oh and Petronis discuss emerging evidence of time-dependent patterns of DNA modification and describe how incorporating this 'chrono-epigenetic' perspective could add value and interpretability in human disease studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available