4.5 Article

Effective shear and bulk viscosities for anisotropic flow

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW C
Volume 103, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.103.044907

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico) [312932/2018-9]
  2. INCTFNA [464898/2014-5]
  3. FAPESP [2018/24720-6]
  4. USP-COFECUB [Uc Ph 160-16, 2015/13]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that the viscous damping of anisotropic flow in heavy-ion collisions is primarily determined by effective shear and bulk viscosities, which are weighted averages over temperature. Additionally, it was shown that at a fixed collision energy, the effective viscosity is independent of centrality and system size to the same extent as the mean transverse momentum of outgoing hadrons.
We evaluate the viscous damping of anisotropic flow in heavy-ion collisions for arbitrary temperature-dependent shear and bulk viscosities. We show that the damping is solely determined by effective shear and bulk viscosities, which are weighted averages over the temperature. We determine the relevant weights for nucleus-nucleus collisions at root(NN)-N-s = 5.02 TeV and 200 GeV, corresponding to the maximum Large Hadron Collider (LHC) and Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) energies, by running ideal and viscous hydrodynamic simulations. The effective shear viscosity is driven by temperatures below 210 MeV at RHIC and below 280 MeV at the LHC, with the largest contributions coming from the lowest temperatures, just above freeze-out. The effective bulk viscosity is driven by somewhat higher temperatures, corresponding to earlier stages of the collision. We show that at a fixed collision energy, the effective viscosity is independent of centrality and system size, to the same extent as the mean transverse momentum of outgoing hadrons. The variation of viscous damping is determined by Reynolds number scaling.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available