4.3 Article

Overlapping and distinct neural networks supporting novel word learning in bilinguals and monolinguals

Journal

BILINGUALISM-LANGUAGE AND COGNITION
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages 524-536

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S1366728920000589

Keywords

bilingualism; word learning; lexical integration; fMRI

Funding

  1. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) Brain and Cognition Grant [433-09-239]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found that monolinguals and bilinguals reached largely comparable behavioral performance levels in novel word learning, but did so by recruiting partially overlapping but non-identical neural systems.
This study investigated how bilingual experience alters neural mechanisms supporting novel word learning. We hypothesised that novel words elicit increased semantic activation in the larger bilingual lexicon, potentially stimulating stronger memory integration than in monolinguals. English monolinguals and Spanish-English bilinguals were trained on two sets of written Swahili-English word pairs, one set on each of two consecutive days, and performed a recognition task in the MRI-scanner. Lexical integration was measured through visual primed lexical decision. Surprisingly, no group difference emerged in explicit word memory, and priming occurred only in the monolingual group. This difference in lexical integration may indicate an increased need for slow neocortical interleaving of old and new information in the denser bilingual lexicon. The fMRI data were consistent with increased use of cognitive control networks in monolinguals and of articulatory motor processes in bilinguals, providing further evidence for experience-induced neural changes: monolinguals and bilinguals reached largely comparable behavioural performance levels in novel word learning, but did so by recruiting partially overlapping but non-identical neural systems to acquire novel words.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available