4.3 Article

Automatic breast tissue segmentation in MRIs with morphology snake and deep denoiser training via extended Stein's unbiased risk estimator

Journal

HEALTH INFORMATION SCIENCE AND SYSTEMS
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s13755-021-00143-x

Keywords

Image segmentation; MRI; Inverse Gaussian gradient; Morphology snakes; Breast cancer; Adaptive histogram equalization; Extended Stein’ s unbiased risk estimator

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Accurate segmentation of breast tissue in MR images is challenging, especially with low contrast images. A new fully automatic and fast segmentation approach is proposed in this study, combining histogram and inverse Gaussian gradient morphology snakes, along with extended Stein's unbiased risk estimator for unsupervised learning of deep neural network Gaussian denoisers to accurately identify landmarks such as chest and breast.
Accurate segmentation of the breast tissue is a significant challenge in the analysis of breast MR images, especially analysis of breast images with low contrast. Most of the existing methods for breast segmentation are semi-automatic and limited in their ability to achieve accurate results. This is because of difficulties in removing landmarks from noisy magnetic resonance images (MRI). Especially, when tumour is imaged for scanning, how to isolate the tumour region from chest will directly affect the accuracy for tumour to be detected. Due to low intensity levels and the close connection between breast and chest portion in MRIs, this study proposes an innovative, fully automatic and fast segmentation approach which combines histogram with inverse Gaussian gradient for morphology snakes, along with extended Stein's unbiased risk estimator (eSURE) applied for unsupervised learning of deep neural network Gaussian denoisers, aimed at accurate identification of landmarks such as chest and breast.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available