4.7 Article

The graphene oxide and chitosan biopolymer loads TiO2 for antibacterial and preservative research

Journal

FOOD CHEMISTRY
Volume 221, Issue -, Pages 267-277

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.10.054

Keywords

Graphene oxide; Titanium dioxide; Antibacterial; Preservation; Biocompatibility

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21171070, 21371075]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [2014A030311025, S2013010011660]
  3. Planned Item of Science and Technology of Guangdong Province [2016A020217011]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Microorganism breeding is a known cause of food spoilage and disease transmission. Aspergillus niger (A. niger) and Bacillus subtilis (B. subtilis) are examples of microorganisms that cause deterioration of fresh fruits and vegetables during storage, which can be a serious threat to human health. In this work, we synthesized a self-assembled film of graphene oxide (GO) and chitosan (CS) biopolymers with titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanoparticles embedded in its surface. We then characterized its antibacterial and preservative properties. We found that these non-cytotoxic nanometer-scale films, especially when the ratio of graphene oxide, chitosan and titanium dioxide nanoparticles in the nanocomposites is 1: 20: 4, exhibited high antibacterial activity against the biofilm-forming strains A. niger and B. subtilis. The preservation capacity of the nanocomposites was evaluated by enzymatic experiments. The nanocomposites did not show any cytotoxicity against mammalian somatic cells and plant cells. Altogether, this work demonstrated that the nanocomposites disrupted microbial film formation while avoiding internalization by animal and plant cells. Due to their selectivity and safety, these nanocomposites demonstrate potential as antimicrobial coatings for food preservation. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available