4.5 Article

Detecting flying insects using car nets and DNA metabarcoding

Journal

BIOLOGY LETTERS
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2020.0833

Keywords

insect diversity; mass collected insects; DNA metabarcoding; COI; car nets; citizen science

Funding

  1. Aage V. Jensen Naturfond

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study demonstrates how car nets and DNA metabarcoding can be used to sample flying insect richness and diversity at large spatial scales. The results show high proportions of Diptera in Denmark, lower insect richness and diversity in urbanized areas, and the detection of previously unknown species in Denmark.
Monitoring insects across space and time is challenging, due to their vast taxonomic and functional diversity. This study demonstrates how nets mounted on rooftops of cars (car nets) and DNA metabarcoding can be applied to sample flying insect richness and diversity across large spatial scales within a limited time period. During June 2018, 365 car net samples were collected by 151 volunteers during two daily time intervals on 218 routes in Denmark. Insect bulk samples were processed with a DNA metabarcoding protocol to estimate taxonomic composition, and the results were compared to known flying insect richness and occurrence data. Insect and hoverfly richness and diversity were assessed across biogeographic regions and dominant land cover types. We detected 15 out of 19 flying insect orders present in Denmark, with high proportions of especially Diptera compared to Danish estimates, and lower insect richness and diversity in urbanized areas. We detected 319 species not known for Denmark and 174 species assessed in the Danish Red List. Our results indicate that the methodology can assess the flying insect fauna at large spatial scales to a wide extent, but may be, like other methods, biased towards certain insect orders.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available