4.4 Article

The ?Little Red Riding Hood effect:? Fitspiration is just as bad as thinspiration for women?s body satisfaction

Journal

BODY IMAGE
Volume 36, Issue -, Pages 201-213

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2020.11.012

Keywords

Fitspiration; Thinspiration; Social media; Positive body image; Body satisfaction; Appearance comparison

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that exposure to fitspiration and thinspiration leads to lower body satisfaction, while positive body image may reduce engagement in appearance comparisons, acting as a protective factor.
Fitspiration is a popular form of social media which outwardly promotes the pursuit of health and strength rather than of thinness. Content analyses, however, suggest that it is thematically similar to thinspiration, which is primarily associated with thinness and presents disordered eating as a lifestyle choice. Exposure to both reduces body satisfaction, but their effect has not been compared. Further, positive body image may act as a protective factor by reducing engagement in appearance comparisons. Female undergraduate students (N = 331) were randomly assigned to view fitspiration, thinspiration, or travel images, followed by measures of state body satisfaction, state appearance comparison, and positive body image. Viewing fitspiration and thinspiration resulted in lower body satisfaction than did viewing travel images. However, whereas women with higher positive body image appeared protected from thinspiration by engaging in lower appearance comparisons than did women with lower positive body image, this same effect was not observed in women who viewed fitspiration. The fact that positive body image is not protective against fitspiration suggests that fitspiration is just as harmful, if not more, than is thinspiration and highlights the need for media literacy programs targeting fitspiration and so-called ?healthy living? websites. ? 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available