4.6 Article

Prospects and limitations of single-crystal cathode materials to overcome cross-talk phenomena in high-voltage lithium ion cells

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
Volume 9, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0ta11775g

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. BMW Group
  2. CATL

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found that increasing the cell voltage of lithium ion batteries to above 4.3V can enhance specific energy, but conventional poly-crystal cathode active materials may fail at 4.5V. On the other hand, CAMs based on single-crystals show improved cycle life and reduced failure and cross-talk at high voltages.
The specific energy of lithium ion batteries can be further enhanced by increasing the cell voltage (>4.3 V). However, conventional cathode active materials (CAMs) e.g. LiNi0.5Co0.2Mn0.3O2 (NCM523) with typical poly-crystal (PC)-based secondary particles suffer from rollover failure at 4.5 V, which is shown to be the result of an electrode cross-talk, i.e., dissolution of transition metals (TMs) from the cathode and deposition at the graphite-based anode. Interestingly, the TM deposits at the anode are locally accumulated and dendritic Li deposits are analytically indicated on exactly these spots. Severe formation of Li dendrites is concluded to be the onset of sudden and abrupt capacity fade as it is accompanied by severe consumption of active Li. In contrast, NCM523 CAMs based on single-crystals (SCs), which are single-standing primary particles, demonstrate an improved cycle life in SC-NCM523graphite cells. Less rollover fading, cross-talk and Li dendrites at the anode are observed and attributed to the morphology of the SC-based cathode. It is concluded that the lower specific surface area diminishes electrolyte contact, thus the reaction area for transition metal dissolution and finally improves the high voltage performance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available