4.5 Review

Big Data-Based Epidemiology of Uveitis and Related Intraocular Inflammation

Journal

ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages 60-62

Publisher

ASIA-PACIFIC ACAD OPHTHALMOLOGY-APAO
DOI: 10.1097/APO.0000000000000364

Keywords

epidemiology; intraocular inflammation; large health databases; uveitis

Categories

Funding

  1. NEI NIH HHS [L60 EY030684] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The availability of more health-related data has allowed for a better understanding of the epidemiology and risk factors of ocular inflammatory diseases, providing valuable information for treatment. While there are advantages to using large databases, clinicians should also be aware of limitations such as the lack of standardization in terminology and coding. As more robust datasets become available, clinicians and scientists can leverage these tools to enhance their understanding of disease pathophysiology and improve patient management.
Large administrative health databases, nationwide surveys, and the widespread adoption of electronic medical records have led to an increasing availability of health-related data on ocular inflammatory disease, allowing us to elucidate the real-world epidemiology of uveitis and examine patient and systems-level risk factors for the incidence of specific etiologies of uveitis and its complications. Despite the many advantages to using big databases, there arc also limitations that clinicians must be aware of when making conclusions and extrapolating to the general population, such as the lack of standardization of nomenclature and coding. As the availability of even more robust datasets increases, clinicians and scientists should be prepared to leverage these tools to improve our understanding of disease pathophysiology and our ability to manage patients with ocular inflammatory disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available