4.7 Article

Comparison of DNA extraction methods for meat analysis

Journal

FOOD CHEMISTRY
Volume 221, Issue -, Pages 1253-1257

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.11.032

Keywords

Genomic DNA extraction; Meat and meat products; Adulteration; Spectrophotometric analysis; Fluorometric analysis; qPCR; Biometrology

Funding

  1. Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey
  2. National Metrology Institute of Turkey
  3. TUBITAK UME, Production of reference material for identification of meat species Project [G3BA-E1-01-I]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Preventing adulteration of meat and meat products with less desirable or objectionable meat species is important not only for economical, religious and health reasons, but also, it is important for fair trade practices, therefore, several methods for identification of meat and meat products have been developed. In the present study, ten different DNA extraction methods, including Tris-EDTA Method, a modified Cetyltrimethylammonium Bromide (CTAB) Method, Alkaline Method, Urea Method, Salt Method, Guanidinium Isothiocyanate (GuSCN) Method, Wizard Method, Qiagen Method, Zymogen Method and Genespin Method were examined to determine their relative effectiveness for extracting DNA from meat samples. The results show that the salt method is easy to perform, inexpensive and environmentally friendly. Additionally, it has the highest yield among all the isolation methods tested. We suggest this method as an alternative method for DNA isolation from meat and meat products. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available