3.8 Article

The SE-AssessWrist for robot-aided assessment of wrist stiffness and range of motion: Development and experimental validation

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/2055668320985774

Keywords

Robotic rehabilitation; medical robotics; human-robot interaction; series elastic actuator; wrist biomechanics

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program [1450681]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

SE-AssessWrist extends the capabilities of robotic devices by including complete wrist range of motion assessment and stiffness evaluation. Experimental validation showed that the device achieves desired range of motion and provides sufficient control performance for wrist biomechanical assessment. Measurements revealed that the axis of greatest range of motion and least stiffness were oblique to anatomical axes and approximately parallel to each other.
Introduction: Physical human-robot interaction offers a compelling platform for assessing recovery from neurological injury; however, robots currently used for assessment have typically been designed for the requirements of rehabilitation, not assessment. In this work, we present the design, control, and experimental validation of the SE-AssessWrist, which extends the capabilities of prior robotic devices to include complete wrist range of motion assessment in addition to stiffness evaluation. Methods: The SE-AssessWrist uses a Bowden cable-based transmission in conjunction with series elastic actuation to increase device range of motion while not sacrificing torque output. Experimental validation of robot-aided wrist range of motion and stiffness assessment was carried out with five able-bodied individuals. Results: The SE-AssessWrist achieves the desired maximum wrist range of motion, while having sufficient position and zero force control performance for wrist biomechanical assessment. Measurements of two-degree-of-freedom wrist range of motion and stiffness envelopes revealed that the axis of greatest range of motion and least stiffness were oblique to the conventional anatomical axes, and approximately parallel to each other. Conclusions: Such an assessment could be beneficial in the clinic, where standard clinical measures of recovery after neurological injury are subjective, labor intensive, and graded on an ordinal scale.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available