3.8 Review

Hybrid metal additive manufacturing: A state-of-the-art review

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aime.2021.100032

Keywords

Additive manufacturing; Hybrid additive manufacturing; Metals; Machining; Forming

Funding

  1. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia
  2. IDMEC [LAETA-UIDB/50022/2020, PTDC/EME-EME/0949/2020]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper discusses the early developments and working principles of additive manufacturing of polymers, as well as the extension to metals with identification and characterization of two most common technologies, and recent developments in hybrid metal additive manufacturing. It emphasizes the importance of combining additive manufacturing with traditional manufacturing processes to overcome limitations and promote new applications.
This paper starts from the early developments and working principles of the additive manufacturing of polymers, continues with a glimpse on the extension to metals with identification and characterization of the two most widespread technologies, and ends with an overview of the recent developments in hybrid metal additive manufacturing. Earlier classifications of hybrid manufacturing with roots on the utilization of primarily processed raw materials in the form of ingots, sheets, rods, tubes, profiles, powders and pellets are revisited in the light of the emergence of a new type of hybridization resulting from the combination of additive manufacturing with traditional manufacturing processes. Special emphasis is given to the combination of additive manufacturing with forming processes with the twofold objective of (i) increasing the applicability domain of metal additive manufacturing and overcoming its limitations related to low productivity, metallurgical defects, rough surface quality and lack of dimensional precision, and (ii) adding flexibility and fostering new applications of traditional forming processes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available