4.7 Review

N-Heterocyclic silylenes as ambiphilic activators and ligands

Journal

DALTON TRANSACTIONS
Volume 50, Issue 20, Pages 6752-6765

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1dt00617g

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Julius-Maximilians-Universitat Wurzburg

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study highlights the recent developments of N-heterocyclic silylenes (NHSis) as ambiphilic activators and ligands in organometallic chemistry, comparing their properties with N-heterocyclic carbenes (NHC) and phosphine ligands. NHSis show different ligation properties due to their unique frontier orbital region compared to NHCs, with donor properties closer to phosphines. They exhibit a stronger tendency to act as bridging ligands between metal centers and achieve more facile insertion reactions into metal-ligand bonds than NHCs, providing novel reactivities in basic organometallic chemistry and catalysis.
This frontiers article highlights recent developments of the use of N-heterocyclic silylenes (NHSis), the higher homologues of the Arduengo-carbenes, as ambiphilic activators and ligands in organometallic chemistry and provides a comparison of five-membered ring NHSi ligands with ubiquitous N-heterocyclic carbene (NHC) and phosphine ligands. The frontier orbital region of NHSis differs considerably from that of NHCs which results in different ligation properties. The donor properties of NHSis are closer to those of phosphines than to those of NHCs. NHSis reveal a much stronger tendency to act as bridging ligands between two metal centres than NHCs or phosphines and NHSi insertion reactions into metal-ligand bonds are more facile to achieve compared to similar insertion reactions of NHCs. These interesting properties clearly distinguish NHSi ligands from their NHC or phosphine counterparts and should provide novel reactivities in basic organometallic chemistry and catalysis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available