4.7 Article

Transcriptional regulation of lycopene metabolism mediated by rootstock during the ripening of grafted watermelons

Journal

FOOD CHEMISTRY
Volume 214, Issue -, Pages 406-411

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.07.103

Keywords

Watermelon; Grafting; Rootstock; Lycopene; Metabolic regulation; Fruit ripening

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31471894, 31201660]
  2. National Science & Technology Pillar Program during the 12th Five-year Plan Period [2012BAD02B03-16]
  3. earmarked fund for Modern Agroindustry Technology Research System [CARS-26-16]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Provincial Education Department [KJ2013B171]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rootstocks have comprehensive effects on lycopene accumulation in grafted watermelon fruits. However, little is known about lycopene metabolic regulation in grafted watermelon. To address this problem, parallel changes in lycopene contents and the expression of its metabolic genes were analyzed during the fruit ripening of nongrafted watermelon and watermelon grafted onto bottle gourd, pumpkin, and wild watermelon. Results showed that rootstocks mediated the transcriptional regulations of lycopene accumulation in different ways. Bottle gourd and wild watermelon promoted lycopene accumulation in grafted watermelon fruits by upregulating the biosynthetic genes phytoene synthase (PSY) and zeta-carotene desaturase (ZDS), and downregulating the catabolic genes beta-carotene hydroxylase (CHYB), zeaxanthin epoxidase (ZEP), 9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase (NCED), and carotenoid cleavage dioxygenase (CCD). However, pumpkin did not affect lycopene accumulation by upregulating both biosynthetic and catabolic genes. The rootstock-dependent characteristic of lycopene accumulation in grafted watermelon fruits provided an alternative model for investigating lycopene metabolic regulation. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available