4.7 Review

Defect-mediated electron transfer in photocatalysts

Journal

CHEMICAL COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 57, Issue 29, Pages 3532-3542

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1cc00204j

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) of the Japanese Government [19H02812, 25220806]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [19H02812] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article summarizes the recent progress in unraveling defect-mediated electron transfer in TiO2 and polymeric carbon nitride photocatalysts through ultrafast time-resolved spectroscopy and theoretical simulations. The study reveals that the photogenerated electron transfer is significantly influenced by the type and concentration of defects, highlighting the importance of carefully tuning the defect states, occupation, and dispersion degree for maximizing the advantages of defects in photocatalytic reactions.
Photocatalysis holds great potential in alleviating the growing energy crisis and environmental issues. Defect engineering has been demonstrated as an effective method to modulate the electronic structure of semiconductor photocatalysts for enhanced visible light absorption. However, the effect of defects on photocatalytic activity is still under debate because of the elusive charge transfer process mediated by defects. In this feature article, we summarize our recent progress in unraveling the defect-mediated electron transfer of the widely studied TiO2 and polymeric carbon nitride photocatalysts by combining ultrafast time-resolved spectroscopy and theoretical simulations. We find that the photogenerated electron transfer is greatly dependent on the type and concentration of defects. The location and occupation of defect states, and the dispersion degree of the energy band should be carefully tuned to maximize the advantages of defects for photocatalytic reactions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available