4.5 Article

Exploring the status of diversity in policies and practices of Spanish universities. An asymmetric dual model

Journal

HELIYON
Volume 7, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06450

Keywords

Higher education; Diversity; Critical pedagogy; Asymmetric dual model; Spain

Funding

  1. Spain's Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities [EDU2017-82862-R]
  2. [FPU2017/02463]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study revealed an average level of institutionalization of diversity in Spanish universities, but no association with productivity indicators. The conclusion is that Spanish universities have adopted an asymmetric dual model, combining neoliberal ideas with certain innovations to protect vulnerable groups.
Higher education across the world is currently in the throes of assuming a commitment to diversity. However, certain critical positions maintain that such evolution is still guided by market principles. Within such a context, this paper explores what attention is given to diversity in Spanish university policies and practices and how it relates to key productivity indicators. To do so, a study with a descriptive and correlational design was conducted, based on analysing institutional documents and surveying chief diversity officers, techniques which provided evidence about diversity philosophy and practices, respectively. The results revealed at least an average level of institutionalisation of diversity, although it did not demonstrate, in most of the areas, any association with indicators derived from a consolidated ranking by productivity in Spain. The conclusion is that Spanish universities have adopted an asymmetric dual model, in which neo-liberal ideas maintain their hegemony while, although subordinately, certain innovations have been consolidated in parallel in order to protect a number of vulnerable groups under the rhetoric of equity and social justice.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available