4.7 Article

Mono(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate induces autophagy-dependent apoptosis through lysosomal-mitochondrial axis in human endothelial cells

Journal

FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY
Volume 106, Issue -, Pages 273-282

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2017.05.069

Keywords

MEHP; Autophagy; Apoptosis; Lysosomal-mitochondrial axis; Cathepsin B

Funding

  1. Liaoning Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [2014023004]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mono(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (MEHP), the active metabolite of di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP), has been known to have adverse effects on the reproductive system, urologic systems, hepatic, developmental toxicities and carcinogenicity. However, the effect of MEHP on cardiovascular toxicity remains unclear. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the cytotoxic effects of MEHP and the possible molecular mechanism. We found that treatment of EA.hy 926 cells with MEHP induced autophagy at earlier time (6 h) in this study. Lysosomal membrane permeabilization (LMP) occurred, after treatment with MEHP for 12 h, followed by the release of cathepsin B. Autophagy inhibitor 3-methyladenine (3MA) attenuated MEHP-induced LMP and the release of cathepsin B in EA.hy 926 cells. Additionally, MEHP induced collapse of mitochondrial transmembrane potential, which was evidenced by JC-1 staining. Addition of 3MA relieved MEHP-induced apoptosis as assessed by the expression of caspase 3 and TUNEL assay, indicating that MEHP-induced apoptois was autophagy-dependent. Cathepsin B inhibitor, CA-074 Me, suppressed MEHP-induced the mitochondria release of cytochrome c and apoptosis as well. In summary, our results suggest that MEHP induced autophagy-dependent apoptosis in EA.hy 926 cells through the lysosomal-mitochondrial axis. This study provides new mechanistic insights into MEHP-induced cardiovascular toxicity. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available