Journal
SIAM-ASA JOURNAL ON UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages 231-259Publisher
SIAM PUBLICATIONS
DOI: 10.1137/19M1270185
Keywords
model discrepancy; uncertainty quantification; bound-to-bound data collaboration; inverse problem
Funding
- U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration [DE-NA0002375]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study extends the methodology of bound-to-bound data collaboration in an optimization-based deterministic uncertainty quantification framework to explicitly account for model discrepancy. The discrepancy is represented as a linear combination of finite basis functions and modifications are made to prediction formulas. Prior information about model discrepancy can also be included as additional constraints to enhance framework accuracy. Dataset consistency, a central feature of B2BDC, is generalized based on the extended framework.
We extend the existing methodology in bound-to-bound data collaboration (B2BDC), an optimizationbased deterministic uncertainty quantification (UQ) framework, to explicitly take into account model discrepancy. The discrepancy is represented as a linear combination of finite basis functions, and the feasible set is constructed according to a collection of modified model-data constraints. Formulas for making predictions are also modified to include the model discrepancy function. Prior information about the model discrepancy can be added to the framework as additional constraints. Dataset consistency, a central feature of B2BDC, is generalized based on the extended framework.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available