4.6 Article

Factors affecting pedestrian behaviors at signalized crosswalks: An empirical study

Journal

JOURNAL OF SAFETY RESEARCH
Volume 76, Issue -, Pages 269-275

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsr.2020.12.019

Keywords

Pedestrian behavior; Road safety; Crosswalks; Pedestrian crashes; Health Belief Model

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study assessed the behaviors and factors of pedestrians at signalized crosswalks. Findings indicated that some pedestrians crossed on red lights, females were more likely to cross while chatting with others, and pedestrians at road intersections walked slower than those at mid-block crossings.
Introduction: Safety of pedestrians depends, among other factors, on their behavior while crossing the road. This study aims to assess behaviors of pedestrians at signalized crosswalks. Method: Following a literature review and a pilot study, 25 vital pedestrian crossing factors and behaviors were determined. Then data was randomly collected for 708 pedestrians at 10 lighted crossings in Sharjah (UAE), five at road intersections and five mid-block crossings. Results: Results indicated that 17.4% of pedestrians observed crossed partly or fully on red and that crossing speed was 1.22 m/s, on the average, which is slightly faster than most speeds recorded in the literature. Moreover, female pedestrians were more likely to cross while chatting with others, less likely to cross on red, and more likely to walk slower than male pedestrians. Results also showed that pedestrians who crossed at road intersections walked slower than those who crossed at mid-block crossings. It was also found that longer red pedestrian times and narrower roads tended to encourage pedestrians to cross on red and that the majority of pedestrians did not look around before crossing. Practical implications: Use of the Health Belief Model for pedestrian safety are discussed. (C) 2020 National Safety Council and Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available