4.5 Article

Towards incorporating asexually reproducing fungi in the natural classification and notes for pleomorphic genera

Journal

MYCOSPHERE
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages 238-405

Publisher

MYCOSPHERE PRESS
DOI: 10.5943/mycosphere/12/1/4

Keywords

Article 59.1; Coelomycetous; Hyphomycetous; one fungus one name; Pleomorphism

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [NSFC 31950410558, NSFC 31760013]
  2. Department of Science and Technology of Yunnan Province [2018FB050]
  3. State Key Laboratory of Functions and Applications of Medicinal Plants, Guizhou Medicial University [FAMP201906K]
  4. Science and Technology Department of Guizhou Province [QKHRCPT[2017]5101]
  5. High-Level Talent Recruitment Plan of Yunnan Provinces (Young Talents Program)
  6. High-Level Talent Recruitment Plan of Yunnan Provinces (High-End Foreign Experts Program)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper focuses on asexually reproducing fungi and particularly on pleomorphic genera. It also mentions unlinked genera without molecular data being listed as Ascomycota genera incertae sedis, suggesting the importance of DNA analysis to uncover new fungal lineages.
This is a continuation of a series of studies incorporating asexually reproducing fungi in a natural classification. Over 3653 genera (ca. 30,000 morphological species) are known from asexual reproduction (1388 coelomycetes and 2265 hyphomycetes) in their life cycle. Among these, 687 genera are pleomorphic (305 coelomycetous; 378 hyphomycetous and four genera show both coelomycetous and hyphomycetous morphs). We provide notes for these pleomorphic genera in this paper. The 1544 unlinked genera without molecular data (which comprise ca. 3850 species) are listed as Ascomycota genera incertae sedis. It is essential to recollect the fungi which are placed in Ascomycota genera incertae sedis and subject them to DNA based phylogenetic analysis as they might represent new fungal lineages.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available