4.8 Article

The different composites of cellulose nanocrystals with d- or l-histidine

Journal

NANOSCALE
Volume 13, Issue 17, Pages 8174-8180

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1nr00946j

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51673210]
  2. Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility (SSRF, Shanghai, China) [2020-SSRF-PT-012605]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study demonstrated a chirality-related difference in the composite films of cellulose nanocrystals and histidine with a d- or l-configuration, which is not only presented in the self-assembled nanostructures of CNCs, optical properties, and the thermal decomposition of composites but also in the crystallization of the amino acid, possibly originating from the packing of amino acids on the twisted surface of CNCs. The enantio-specific interaction between the chiral amino acid and polysaccharide nanostructure is of significant importance for developing a new strategy for enantiomeric separation.
Cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs) are inherently right-handed nanostructures that originate from nature, showing chirality in their fibrils, bundles, and self-assembled films. However, the enantio-specific interaction between CNCs and other chiral molecules has not been explored so far. In this study, we first demonstrated a chirality-related difference in the composite films of cellulose nanocrystals and histidine with a d- or l-configuration. The distinction is not only presented in the self-assembled nanostructures of CNCs, optical properties, and the thermal decomposition of composites but also in the crystallization of the amino acid. We suppose that it might have originated from the packing of amino acids on the twisted surface of CNCs. The knowledge about the enantio-specific interaction between the chiral amino acid and polysaccharide nanostructure is of significant importance for developing a new strategy for enantiomeric separation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available