4.4 Article

Determination of Retrogradation Degree in Starch by Mid-infrared and Raman Spectroscopy during Storage

Journal

FOOD ANALYTICAL METHODS
Volume 10, Issue 11, Pages 3694-3705

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12161-017-0932-0

Keywords

Retrogradation degree; Starch; Raman spectroscopy; MIR spectroscopy; Partial least-squares

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFD0401104]
  2. National Science and Technology Support Program [2015BAD17B04]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31671844]
  4. natural science foundation of Jiangsu province [BK20160506, BE2016306]
  5. International Science and Technology Cooperation Project of Jiangsu Province [BZ2016013]
  6. Suzhou Science and Technology Project [SNG201503]
  7. Six talent peaks project in Jiangsu Province [GDZB-016]
  8. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Retrogradation behavior is an important physicochemical property of starch during storage. A fast and sensitive method was developed for determining the retrogradation degree (RD) in corn starch by mid-infrared (MIR), Raman spectroscopy, and combination of MIR and Raman. MIR and Raman spectra were collected from different retrogradation starch and then processed by partial least squares (PLS), interval PLS (iPLS), synergy interval PLS (siPLS), and backward interval PLS (biPLS). Two different levels of fusion data extracted from MIR and Raman spectra were analyzed by PLS. The developed models demonstrated that both MIR and Raman techniques combined with chemometrics can be used to determine the RD in starch. The PLS model built by medium-level fusion approach achieved the most satisfied performance with a correlation coefficient of 0.9658. Integrating MIR and Raman technique combined with chemometrics improved the prediction performance of RD in comparison with a single technique.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available